LMAO at this butt hurt fest LOL......a WHOPPING 2 horsepower difference, is basically NO difference from going from the relatively more efficient ELH to a tomei UEL......500 RPM spool difference is also relatively insignificant. All the butt hurt ELH proponents that are angry that the UELH is making a huge come back in the Subaru community, with the BRZ, and the WRX owners flocking to the tomei!!!! ITs hilarious how much this is bothering people, especially the "engineers" that were touting how the header wouldnt work with the twin scroll, and make it sound like going with ANY UELH over the factory (supposedly "much more efficient) cast manifold would cause a massive horsepower and torque loss and cause the engine to self destruct LMAO!!!!
TWO....yes TWO horsepower difference LMAO. This just proves that the UELH design is only minimally less efficient...its all relative....I mean you would think with the way people were comparing the 180 bends..that were so so horrible to flow....and the exhaust pulses backing up in the collector....oh the horror!!! The horror of a T W O horsepower loss.
Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!
BTW that wouldnt make the car "slower" at all. And we dont know what type of changes were made to the timing fueling and boost tables relative to the tune on the stock header on this car. That WHOPPING market crashing TWO horsepower(LOL), could be from so many other metrics in the tune, aside from just the header design alone.
Its a win win either way....car sounds better, has a beautifully manufactured header..the stock header looks like ca ca...and sounds like ca ca....tomei looks fantastic...sounds fantastic and even with a(relatively), less efficient design showed only a supposed TWO......TWO horsepower difference. LOL That's basically no difference. Just proves ELH doesnt have any huge advantange over the UELH....that at best its a minimally relative difference.
Better sound, better looks, equal performance Win Win Win!!!
Probably tuned conservatively as well I bet.....
Ahhhhh its a great day.