View Single Post
Old 06-26-2017, 09:18 AM   #124
maperformance
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 141043
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Cottage Grove, MN
Vehicle:
2011 STI
black af

Default

Hey man. Glad to see you got around to playing with them. Glad you give it the seal of approval. Business practices aside, I still respect the heck out of your opinion. Trusting you with them wasn't to shoot ourselves in the foot really, but to maybe bring some like minded Suby fans closer together.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junior2JZ View Post




Nasiocs attachment features SUCKS, but here is the link and or even possibly the picture of my comparison.. if the page feels like working properly.

MAP HEADER vs AP EL( not the best, and AP may suck in general, but its a decent header )

As much as I dislike some of MAPs business practices, I can honestly say the header is a good piece.

While the gains are not as drastic as the original ****ty comparison made, the GAINS are still there. We sent a bore scope down the runners to check the collector and where very surprised to see its a nice design. Overall the header is a good sound design.

This was a direct swap of the header on the same car, on the dyno with the same start and stop AIT/COOLANT temp and 0 changes to the tuning. Boost error was on point, so boost was within .15-.25psi . We made the comparison as equal as humanly possible. It picks up power EVERYWHERE.

Id say its a good value for the money. I also want to thank MAP for having trust in my honesty lol.. They pretty much set themselves up for a huge fail if this thing did not preform. My assumptions where wrong.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
maperformance is offline   Reply With Quote